Voluntary Fire Equipment, Timely Response Saved Lives – Queen Of The North

image

Queen of the West — Crew did it right

Fire sup­pres­sion equipped installed vol­un­tar­ily by Majes­tic Amer­ica Line aboard the replica pad­dle­wheeler Queen of the North fol­low­ing an engine room fire  on 8 April 2008, says the US National Trans­porta­tion Safety Board, NTSB. Con­cerns regard­ing the lack of ‘out-of-water flota­tion’, which are not legally required in ves­sels of this type, have resulted in a rec­om­men­da­tion to the US Coast Guard to require out-of-water sur­vival craft for all pas­sen­gers and crew be pro­vided on board small pas­sen­ger ves­sels on all routes.

image

Pres­surised hydraulic fluid is belived to have hit hot exhaust pipe and ignited.

The vintage-style, pad­dle­wheel ves­sel was trav­el­ling east on the Colum­bia River near Rufus, Ore­gon, with 124 overnight pas­sen­gers and 53 crewmem­bers on board, as part of a 7-day cruise when a fire broke out in the engine room, prob­a­bly due to the fail­ure of a pres­sur­ized com­po­nent on the port main propul­sion hydraulic sys­tem, result­ing in hydraulic oil spray­ing onto the port engine’s exhaust pip­ing and igniting.

The fire caused about $3.9 mil­lion in dam­age. One crewmem­ber was treated for mild hypothermia.

Says NTSB: “Majes­tic Amer­ica Line acted proac­tively by installing an auto­matic fire detec­tion sys­tem and a fixed fire sup­pres­sion sys­tem on board the Queen of the West, and this action, which was not required by Coast Guard reg­u­la­tions, lim­ited the fire dam­age to the ves­sel and enhanced the sur­viv­abil­ity of pas­sen­gers and crew… Early use of the fixed fire sup­pres­sion sys­tem avoided a forced evac­u­a­tion and likely pre­vented sig­nif­i­cant injuries and loss of life… The efforts by the Queen of the West crew were timely and appropriate.”

imageIt expresses con­cern that: “Had an emer­gency evac­u­a­tion been required, the absence of out-of-water flotation—not cur­rently required by Coast Guard reg­u­la­tions for a ves­sel of this clas­si­fi­ca­tion oper­at­ing in the waters in which the acci­dent occurred—would have sub­jected both pas­sen­gers and crew to high risk of injury and death from expo­sure to cold water tem­per­a­tures… by the time exter­nal response ves­sels arrived, peo­ple could have been in the water for about two hours, and the cur­rent could have scat­tered them a mile or more down the river.

Equip­ping small pas­sen­ger ves­sels with out-of-water sur­vival craft capa­ble of sup­port­ing 100 per­cent of ves­sel occu­pants is cru­cial in reduc­ing casu­al­ties in the event of an emer­gency evac­u­a­tion into the water.”

A syn­op­sis of the Board’s report, includ­ing the prob­a­ble cause and rec­om­men­da­tions, is avail­able on the NTSB’s web­site at: http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2009/MAR0904.htm

The full report will be avail­able on the web­site in sev­eral weeks.


This entry was posted in Accident report, engine room, fire, news. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.